Nature Chemical Biology

372.4k citations
3.9k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • RNA modifications and cancer
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
    • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
    • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
    • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Papers in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 465
    • RNA modifications and cancer 295
    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 230
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 207
    • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 195
    • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 183
    • RNA Research and Splicing 165

Nature Chemical Biology

3.6k papers receiving 361.6k citations

Peers

Nature Chemical Biology
Comparison fields: 5 of 236
  • Molecular Biology 249.4k
  • Cancer Research 23.1k
  • Pharmacology 25.9k
  • Cell Biology 23.5k
  • Organic Chemistry 38.1k
Replace Nature Reviews Drug Discovery with:
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery United States
Frontiers in Pharmacology China
Experimental Biology and Medicine United States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects United States
Nature Protocols United States
Biochemical Society Transactions United Kingdom
Advances in experimental medicine and biology United States
The Journal of Biochemistry Japan
Food and Chemical Toxicology United States
Current Medicinal Chemistry Italy
Nature Chemical Biology relative to Nature Reviews Drug Discovery United States Nature Reviews Drug Discovery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Nature Chemical Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Chemical Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Chemical Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Chemical Biology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Nature Chemical Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Chemical Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Chemical Biology.

About Nature Chemical Biology

The 3.9k papers published in Nature Chemical Biology in the last decades have received a total of 372.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Nature Chemical Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (2.9k papers), Cell Biology (354 papers), Pharmacology (306 papers), Aging (32 papers) and Biochemistry (129 papers) specifically the topics of RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (465 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (295 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (247 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (230 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (207 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (195 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (183 papers) and RNA Research and Splicing (165 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Chemical Biology are Andrew L. Hopkins, Christine C. Winterbourn, Christopher J. Chang, Brent R. Stockwell, Scott J. Dixon, Carolyn Ruth Bertozzi, Jonathan Gershenzon, Tracey Ann Rouault, Natalia Dudareva and Bryan C. Dickinson.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact