Cheryle Moss

1.5k citations
91 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Cheryle Moss

87 papers receiving 963 citations

Peers

Cheryle Moss
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Research and Theory 68
  • General Health Professions 326
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
  • General Psychology 14
  • Clinical Psychology 215
Replace Barbara A. Munjas with:
Barbara A. Munjas United States
John Playle United Kingdom
Tony Butterworth United Kingdom
Annette Huntington New Zealand
Mary Chambers United Kingdom
Jacqueline McCallum United Kingdom
Nel Glass Australia
Philip Warelow Australia
Mary Sidebotham Australia
Martha Griffin United States
Cheryle Moss relative to Barbara A. Munjas United States Barbara A. Munjas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Barbara A. Munjas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryle Moss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryle Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryle Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryle Moss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryle Moss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryle Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryle Moss. The network helps show where Cheryle Moss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheryle Moss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheryle Moss Line = papers co-authored together Cheryle Moss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201983
2 201054
3 201738
4 198337
5 200935
6 200733
7 201832
8 197929
9 200927
10 201226
11 201125
12 201823
13 201523
14 198322
15 200522
16 200921
17 201421
18
Advancing the practice development outcomes agenda within multiple contexts
201120
19 201620
20 201919

About Cheryle Moss

Cheryle Moss is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science and Research and Theory, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (12 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (10 papers), Nursing education and management (9 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (7 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (68 citations), General Health Professions (326 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations), General Psychology (14 citations) and Clinical Psychology (215 citations). Cheryle Moss has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ray E. Hosford, Wendy Cross, Kenneth Walsh, Melissa J. Bloomer, Robyn Cant, Louisa Lam, Beverley Copnell, Jan Duke, Susan Lee and Julia Morphet. Their work appears in journals such as Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, Contemporary Nurse, International Journal of Nursing Practice, Journal of Clinical Nursing and International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact