Jan Duke

19 papers receiving 665 citations

Jan Duke's Hit Papers

Journal of Law and Medicine 1999 · 519 citations
5190+9+18Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Jan Duke
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Research and Theory 14
  • Public Administration 50
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 13
  • Reproductive Medicine 69
  • Clinical Psychology 172
Replace Brett Scholz with:
Brett Scholz Australia
Korrie de Koning Netherlands
Elianne Riska Finland
Doris Noel Ugarriza United States
Nuala Kenny Canada
Kristin Heggen Norway
Jan Savage United Kingdom
Terry V. Shaw United States
Elena Neiterman Canada
Gerry McGhee United Kingdom
Jan Duke relative to Brett Scholz Australia Brett Scholz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Brett Scholz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Duke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Duke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Duke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Duke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Duke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Duke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Duke. The network helps show where Jan Duke may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Jan Duke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Duke Line = papers co-authored together Jan Duke links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Journal of Law and Medicine
Hit paper breakdown →
1999519
2 200935
3 200929
4 201627
5
Becoming a Culturally Competent Health Practitioner in the Delivery of Culturally Safe Care: A Process Oriented Approach
200923
6 201617
7 199815
8 200910
9 200810
10 20078
11 20098
12 20166
13 20065
14 20074
15 19953
16 20062
17
Toward standardising nursing language in New Zealand.
20061
18
Challenges in Coalition Unconventional Warfare: The Allied Campaign in Yugoslavia, 1941-1945
20141
19
Locating nursing classification schemes within health information strategies for New Zealand.
20071

About Jan Duke

Jan Duke is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Education and Research and Theory, having authored 19 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (3 papers), Research in Social Sciences (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (14 citations), Public Administration (50 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations), Reproductive Medicine (69 citations) and Clinical Psychology (172 citations). Jan Duke has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernadette McSherry, Liz Beddoe, Cheryle Moss, Sarah Lake, Tana Wuliji, Maralyn Foureur, Barbara Murphy, Kenneth Walsh, Ritesh Shah and Christa Fouché. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Nurse, International Journal of Nursing Practice, Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, Sociology of Health & Illness and Human Resources for Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact