Mark Gillespie

42 papers receiving 777 citations

Peers

Mark Gillespie
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Research and Theory 127
  • Leadership and Management 16
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 14
  • Emergency Medicine 97
  • General Health Professions 275
Replace Gunilla Mårtensson with:
Gunilla Mårtensson Sweden
Elena Gurková Slovakia
Karen Kesten United States
Cherene Ockerby Australia
Marzieh Momennasab Iran
Margareta Asp Sweden
Rebecca Jarden Australia
Einav Srulovici Israel
Shahrzad Yektatalab Iran
Maxine Duke Australia
Mark Gillespie relative to Gunilla Mårtensson Sweden Gunilla Mårtensson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Gunilla Mårtensson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gillespie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gillespie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gillespie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gillespie. The network helps show where Mark Gillespie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Gillespie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Gillespie Line = papers co-authored together Mark Gillespie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003117
2 200690
3 200775
4 202166
5 201659
6 201539
7 201632
8 201829
9 201627
10 201725
11 201025
12 202222
13 201922
14 201317
15 201015
16 201814
17 201913
18 201313
19
Comparison of effectiveness of reflexology and abdominal massage on constipation among orthopedic patients: A Single-Blind randomized controlled trial
201612
20 201612

About Mark Gillespie

Mark Gillespie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Research and Theory and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 838 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (7 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (7 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Intramuscular injections and effects (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (127 citations), Leadership and Management (16 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations), Emergency Medicine (97 citations) and General Health Professions (275 citations). Mark Gillespie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vidar Melby, Fateme Mohammadi, Azim Azizi, Hossein Ebrahimi, Reza Negarandeh, Hadi Hassankhani, Leila Valizadeh, Mahnaz Rakhshan, Vahid Zamanzadeh and Hossein Habibzadeh. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Ethics, Journal of Clinical Nursing, BMC Nursing, Nursing Open and Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact