Debra Griffiths

68 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Debra Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 31
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 176
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 99
  • Research and Theory 14
  • Emergency Medicine 112
Replace Maria Arman with:
Maria Arman Sweden
Pamela van der Riet Australia
Barbara M. Dossey United States
Carol P. Vojir United States
Michelle Butler Ireland
Dilek Özden Türkiye
Lena Törnkvist Sweden
Jan Pincombe Australia
Marlaine C. Smith United States
Sonya R. Hardin United States
Debra Griffiths relative to Maria Arman Sweden Maria Arman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Maria Arman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Griffiths. The network helps show where Debra Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together Debra Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011176
2 201187
3 201877
4 201473
5 201373
6 201863
7 201561
8 201552
9 201252
10 201451
11 200936
12 201936
13 198634
14 201332
15 201832
16 201429
17 201128
18 202024
19 201622
20 201821

About Debra Griffiths

Debra Griffiths is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Complementary and alternative medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (10 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (8 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (6 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (4 papers), Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (31 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (176 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (99 citations), Research and Theory (14 citations) and Emergency Medicine (112 citations). Debra Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Lisa McKenna, Helen Hall, Julia Morphet, Kelli Innes, Jill Beattie, Kimberley Crawford, Allison Williams, Gulzar Malik, Tamsin Jones and Margaret O’Connor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Women and Birth, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Midwifery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact