Catherine Lang

57 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Catherine Lang
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Computer Science Applications 147
  • Gender Studies 195
  • Education 228
  • Media Technology 66
  • Safety Research 47
Replace Irma Heemskerk with:
Irma Heemskerk Netherlands
Audrey Rorrer United States
Hilary B. Zimmerman United States
Anneke Smits Netherlands
Rae Condie United Kingdom
Marjolein Drent Netherlands
Toni Downes Australia
Cathy Bishop‐Clark United States
Scott Bulfin Australia
Ruth Furlong India
Catherine Lang relative to Irma Heemskerk Netherlands Irma Heemskerk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Irma Heemskerk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Catherine Lang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Catherine Lang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Catherine Lang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catherine Lang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Catherine Lang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Catherine Lang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Catherine Lang. The network helps show where Catherine Lang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Catherine Lang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Catherine Lang Line = papers co-authored together Catherine Lang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201632
2 201529
3 201228
4 200724
5 201922
6 200821
7 201021
8 201219
9
The next wave of gender projects in IT curriculum teaching at universities
200619
10 201519
11 201017
12 201616
13 200716
14 201615
15 200715
16 200712
17 200712
18 201111
19 201610
20 202010

About Catherine Lang

Catherine Lang is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Computer Science Applications, having authored 61 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender and Technology in Education (32 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (11 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (9 papers), Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development (8 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (8 papers), Education Systems and Policy (7 papers) and Digital Games and Media (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (147 citations), Gender Studies (195 citations), Education (228 citations), Media Technology (66 citations) and Safety Research (47 citations). Catherine Lang has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Annemieke Craig, Julie Fisher, Sue Lewis, Judy McKay, Helen Forgasz, Narelle Lemon, Eva Dakich, Gillian Kidman, Julie Fisher and Nathan Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Science Education, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology and Journal of Information Technology Education Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact