Caroline Vance
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Christopher E. Shaw (31 shared papers)Boris Rogelj (10 shared papers)Ammar Al‐Chalabi (11 shared papers)Jemeen Sreedharan (4 shared papers)Christopher C.J. Miller (3 shared papers)Jacqueline de Belleroche (3 shared papers)Ian P. Blair (2 shared papers)Francisco E. Baralle (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Neurobiology of Aging (8 papers)Acta Neuropathologica (3 papers)Acta Neuropathologica Communications (3 papers)Brain (3 papers)Human Molecular Genetics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Caroline Vance
41 papers receiving 4.8k citations
Caroline Vance's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Neurology 3.6k
- Genetics 2.0k
- Neurology 758
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 567
- Molecular Biology 2.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Vance
This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Vance's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Vance with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Vance more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Vance
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Vance. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Vance. The network helps show where Caroline Vance may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Caroline Vance, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TDP-43 Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 2052 |
| 2 | 2013 | 369 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 269 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 212 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 212 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 198 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 193 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 183 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 136 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 132 | |
| 11 | 2011 | 105 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 90 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 84 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 67 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 62 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 56 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 45 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 36 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 30 |
About Caroline Vance
Caroline Vance is a scholar working on Neurology, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Physiology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (34 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (18 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (11 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (3.6k citations), Genetics (2.0k citations), Neurology (758 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (567 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.1k citations). Caroline Vance has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Christopher E. Shaw, Boris Rogelj, Ammar Al‐Chalabi, Jemeen Sreedharan, Christopher C.J. Miller, Jacqueline de Belleroche, Ian P. Blair, Francisco E. Baralle, Steven Ackerley and P. Nigel Leigh. Their work appears in journals such as Neurobiology of Aging, Acta Neuropathologica, Acta Neuropathologica Communications, Brain and Human Molecular Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.