Carl Spring

860 citations
30 papers · 756 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Carl Spring

29 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers

Carl Spring
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 557
  • Statistics and Probability 210
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 144
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 197
  • Education 188
Replace Kathryn E. Hoff with:
Kathryn E. Hoff United States
Anne Cornwall Canada
Elena Ise Germany
Bradley Bucher Canada
Ruth L. Ault United States
Ariane Holcombe United States
Christian Klicpera Austria
Marcia Broden United States
Lloyd Homme United States
David Marholin United States
Carl Spring relative to Kathryn E. Hoff United States Kathryn E. Hoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Kathryn E. Hoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Carl Spring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carl Spring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carl Spring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carl Spring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carl Spring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carl Spring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carl Spring. The network helps show where Carl Spring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Carl Spring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Carl Spring Line = papers co-authored together Carl Spring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974172
2 198883
3 197454
4 198349
5 197644
6 197442
7 199041
8 197732
9 197532
10 197624
11 198524
12 198120
13 197120
14
Food Additives and Hyperkinesis: A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence.
197617
15 197615
16 197315
17 197513
18 199012
19 199211
20 19777

About Carl Spring

Carl Spring is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (16 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (5 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers) and Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (557 citations), Statistics and Probability (210 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (144 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (197 citations) and Education (188 citations). Carl Spring has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence M. Greenberg, John M. Davis, Jonathan Sandoval, Jimmy Scott, Julius M. Sassenrath and Robert T. Wertz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, The Journal of Special Education, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Contemporary Educational Psychology and Journal of Learning Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact