C. Killer

54 papers receiving 537 citations

Peers

C. Killer
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 249
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 285
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 289
  • Geophysics 105
  • Materials Chemistry 110
Replace N. E. Lanier with:
N. E. Lanier United States
Cong Yu China
Shikha Misra India
Grigory Kagan United States
E. P. Velikhov Russia
C. Castaldo Italy
T. Lehecka United States
А. В. Гавриков Russia
Marco Barbera Italy
Chijie Xiao China
C. Killer relative to N. E. Lanier United States N. E. Lanier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
N. E. Lanier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Killer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Killer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Killer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Killer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Killer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Killer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Killer. The network helps show where C. Killer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Killer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Killer Line = papers co-authored together C. Killer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201649
2 201835
3 201533
4 201330
5 202229
6 201929
7 202022
8 201920
9 201420
10 201619
11 201219
12 201617
13 201915
14 202015
15 201714
16 201114
17 202114
18 202112
19 201812
20 201411

About C. Killer

C. Killer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 58 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (38 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (24 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (17 papers), Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (14 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (9 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (8 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (6 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (249 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (285 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (289 citations), Geophysics (105 citations) and Materials Chemistry (110 citations). C. Killer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include A. Melzer, Michael Himpel, O. Grulke, A. Piel, G. Satheeswaran, R. Schneider, M. Jakubowski, B. Shanahan, the W -X Team and P. Drews. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Nuclear Materials and Energy, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Physics of Plasmas and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact