F. Köchl

3.0k citations
36 papers · 585 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

F. Köchl

32 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

F. Köchl
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 550
  • Aerospace Engineering 213
  • Materials Chemistry 377
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 95
  • Biomedical Engineering 172
Replace J.C. Xu with:
J.C. Xu China
F. Koechl United Kingdom
J. I. Paley Switzerland
L. Aho-Mantila Germany
M. Romanelli United Kingdom
S. Maruyama France
G. Telesca Germany
P. Belo United Kingdom
J. F. Artaud France
A. A. Kavin Russia
F. Köchl relative to J.C. Xu China J.C. Xu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J.C. Xu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Köchl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Köchl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Köchl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Köchl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Köchl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Köchl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Köchl. The network helps show where F. Köchl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Köchl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Köchl Line = papers co-authored together F. Köchl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014166
2 201839
3 201533
4 201332
5 201131
6 201631
7 201828
8 202124
9 200920
10 201817
11 201017
12 201014
13 201114
14 201013
15 201712
16 202210
17 201810
18 20129
19 20219
20 20139

About F. Köchl

F. Köchl is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Aerospace Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (34 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (22 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (14 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (10 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (8 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (5 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (4 papers) and Nuclear Physics and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (550 citations), Aerospace Engineering (213 citations), Materials Chemistry (377 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (95 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (172 citations). F. Köchl has collaborated with scholars based in France, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include V. Parail, L. Garzotti, A. Loarte, D. Harting, A.R. Polevoi, M. Mattei, S. Wiesen, R. Ambrosino, M. Romanelli and E. Militello-Asp. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Materials and Energy and Physics of Plasmas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact