P. Denner

1.1k citations
18 papers · 646 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

P. Denner

16 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

P. Denner
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 614
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 320
  • Aerospace Engineering 182
  • Biomedical Engineering 218
  • Materials Chemistry 213
Replace A. Polevoi with:
A. Polevoi France
G. Cunningham United Kingdom
J. C. Rost United States
M.E. Fenstermacher United States
the MAST team United Kingdom
A. Janzer Germany
M. Price United Kingdom
J.-W. Ahn United States
N Isei Japan
Y. X. Wan China
P. Denner relative to A. Polevoi France A. Polevoi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
A. Polevoi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Denner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Denner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Denner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Denner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Denner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Denner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Denner. The network helps show where P. Denner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Denner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Denner Line = papers co-authored together P. Denner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2013198
2 2012102
3 201184
4 201377
5 201272
6 201042
7 201415
8 201714
9 20159
10 20146
11 20146
12 20135
13 20155
14 20145
15 20114
16 20122
17 20160
18
Effects of 3D magnetic perturbation on divertor heat load redistribution on ASDEX Upgrade
20150

About P. Denner

P. Denner is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 18 papers that have together received 646 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (18 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (9 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (9 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (6 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (4 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (2 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (2 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (614 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (320 citations), Aerospace Engineering (182 citations), Biomedical Engineering (218 citations) and Materials Chemistry (213 citations). P. Denner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and France. Frequent co-authors include E. Nardon, A. Kirk, Yueqiang Liu, J. Harrison, I.T. Chapman, P. Cahyna, Y. Liang, M. Rack, Long Zeng and S. C. Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Journal of Plasma Physics and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact