E. Blanco

1.8k citations
31 papers · 534 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

E. Blanco

27 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

E. Blanco
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 506
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 423
  • Aerospace Engineering 84
  • Oceanography 21
  • Geophysics 20
Replace A. D. Liu with:
A. D. Liu China
J.C. Hillesheim United States
K.J. Zhao China
D. A. Shelukhin Russia
A. Fujisawa Japan
A. Sirinelli France
A. Biancalani Germany
J. M. Chareau France
L. A. Esipov Russia
S. I. Lashkul Russia
E. Blanco relative to A. D. Liu China A. D. Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
A. D. Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Blanco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Blanco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Blanco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Blanco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Blanco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Blanco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Blanco. The network helps show where E. Blanco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Blanco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Blanco Line = papers co-authored together E. Blanco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200985
2 201075
3 201641
4 201135
5 200830
6 200627
7 201025
8 201621
9 201319
10 201017
11 201217
12 201216
13 201015
14 201415
15 201515
16 200614
17 201913
18 201111
19 200911
20 200410

About E. Blanco

E. Blanco is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 31 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (28 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (25 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (14 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (5 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (3 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (3 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (2 papers) and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (506 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (423 citations), Aerospace Engineering (84 citations), Oceanography (21 citations) and Geophysics (20 citations). E. Blanco has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include T. Estrada, T. Happel, C. Hidalgo, E. Ascasíbar, Á. Cappa, J. Sánchez, V. Tribaldos, U. Stroth, B. Ph. van Milligen and G. D. Conway. Their work appears in journals such as Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, Nuclear Fusion, Review of Scientific Instruments, Fusion Engineering and Design and Physics of Plasmas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact