André Schella

432 citations
16 papers · 340 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

André Schella

16 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

André Schella
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Geophysics 88
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 202
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 91
  • Computational Mechanics 44
  • Condensed Matter Physics 21
Replace W.S. Truscott with:
W.S. Truscott United Kingdom
Yuko Inatomi Japan
Huasen Zhang China
Matthias Wolter Germany
R. Bassiri United States
V. V. Yakushev Russia
Tsutomu Ogawa Japan
D. Allen Dalton United States
Michael Himpel Germany
B. K. Saikia India
André Schella relative to W.S. Truscott United Kingdom W.S. Truscott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
W.S. Truscott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by André Schella

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of André Schella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by André Schella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites André Schella more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by André Schella

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by André Schella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by André Schella. The network helps show where André Schella may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside André Schella, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with André Schella Line = papers co-authored together André Schella links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201681
2 201342
3 201141
4 201238
5 201833
6 201224
7 201114
8 201311
9 201310
10 201810
11 20149
12 20178
13 20148
14 20145
15 20145
16 20141

About André Schella

André Schella is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics, Computational Mechanics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dust and Plasma Wave Phenomena (12 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (6 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (5 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (3 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (3 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (3 papers) and Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (88 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (202 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (91 citations), Computational Mechanics (44 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (21 citations). André Schella has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include A. Melzer, Matthias Schröter, Dietmar Block, Stephan Herminghaus, Jan Schablinski, A. Piel, M. Bönitz, Hauke Thomsen, Philip Born and Matthias Sperl. Their work appears in journals such as Soft Matter, The European Physical Journal D, Physical Review B, New Journal of Physics and Physics of Plasmas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact