C. Denoyer

9 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers

C. Denoyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Animal Science and Zoology 254
  • Food Science 142
  • Insect Science 67
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 43
  • Analytical Chemistry 24
Replace Hortensia Galán‐Soldevilla with:
Hortensia Galán‐Soldevilla Spain
Nina Perši Croatia
S. Spagna Musso Italy
P. Pipek Czechia
Lorraine D’Souza United Kingdom
Mogens T. Jensen South Korea
P. Gatellier France
P. Loizzo Italy
E.D. Bastian United States
Almudena Soriano Spain
C. Denoyer relative to Hortensia Galán‐Soldevilla Spain Hortensia Galán‐Soldevilla's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Hortensia Galán‐Soldevilla · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by C. Denoyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of C. Denoyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Denoyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Denoyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by C. Denoyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Denoyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Denoyer. The network helps show where C. Denoyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside C. Denoyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with C. Denoyer Line = papers co-authored together C. Denoyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1991126
2 199977
3 199649
4 199638
5 200228
6 199025
7 199016
8
Les composés volatils fournissent la signature du produit
19981
9
High resolution 13C NMR spectroscopy of rendered animal fats : degree of saturation of fatty acid chains and position on glycerol
19901

About C. Denoyer

C. Denoyer is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Food Science, Insect Science and General Health Professions, having authored 9 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (2 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (1 paper), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper), Health, Medicine and Society (1 paper) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (254 citations), Food Science (142 citations), Insect Science (67 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (43 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (24 citations). C. Denoyer has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Louis Berdagué, Jean‐Luc Le Quéré, Etienne Sémon, Christine Viallon, Régine Talòn, Isabelle Verdier‐Metz, Philippe Pradel, Jean‐Baptiste Coulon, Pascal Tournayre and Marie‐Christine Montel. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Food Science & Technology, Food Research International, Meat Science, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical and Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact