Bijou Yang

124 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Bijou Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Health 285
  • Clinical Psychology 496
  • Information Systems and Management 150
  • Marketing 155
  • General Health Professions 281
Replace Mitchell B. Chamlin with:
Mitchell B. Chamlin United States
Maddy Cunningham United States
Eleni Apospori Greece
Cheskie Rosenzweig United States
Dick J. Hessing Netherlands
John H. Fleming United States
Silvia Saccardo United States
Carrie S. Hurst United States
Angela G. Pirlott United States
Erina L. MacGeorge United States
Bijou Yang relative to Mitchell B. Chamlin United States Mitchell B. Chamlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Mitchell B. Chamlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bijou Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bijou Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bijou Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bijou Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bijou Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bijou Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bijou Yang. The network helps show where Bijou Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Bijou Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bijou Yang Line = papers co-authored together Bijou Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199289
2 200465
3 201359
4 199354
5 200554
6 200449
7 200748
8 199544
9 200738
10 199234
11 199228
12 200428
13
The Economy and Suicide: Economic Perspectives on Suicide
199528
14 200727
15
A comparison of suicide notes written by suicide completers and suicide attempters.
199023
16 199222
17 199422
18 200821
19 201420
20 199119

About Bijou Yang

Bijou Yang is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, General Health Professions and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 131 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (28 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (14 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (14 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (12 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (10 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (285 citations), Clinical Psychology (496 citations), Information Systems and Management (150 citations), Marketing (155 citations) and General Health Professions (281 citations). Bijou Yang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include David Lester, Marcello Spinella, Antoon A. Leenaars, David Lester, Chung-Hsin Yang, Yutaka Motohashi, Paolo Girardi, Maurizio Pompili, Marco Innamorati and Diego De Leo. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Reports, Archives of Suicide Research, The Journal of Social Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior and Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact