Archives of Suicide Research

1.3k papers and 25.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Archives of Suicide Research in the last decades have received a total of 25.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Archives of Suicide Research usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.2k papers), Social Psychology (348 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (243 papers) specifically the topics of Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1.1k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (285 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (245 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archives of Suicide Research are David Lester, Sameer Hinduja, Justin W. Patchin, Jennifer J. Muehlenkamp, Colleen M. Jacobson, Madelyn S. Gould, Peter M. Gutierrez, Graham Martin, Alec Roy and Alan Apter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archives of Suicide Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archives of Suicide Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archives of Suicide Research.

Countries where authors publish in Archives of Suicide Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archives of Suicide Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archives of Suicide Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archives of Suicide Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025