Bert te Wildt

589 citations
24 papers · 420 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Bert te Wildt

22 papers receiving 385 citations

Peers

Bert te Wildt
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Applied Psychology 45
  • Toxicology 23
  • Clinical Psychology 139
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 69
  • Sociology and Political Science 165
Replace Émeline Chauchard with:
Émeline Chauchard France
Jordan Skalisky United States
Stéphane Deline Switzerland
Swarndeep Singh India
Ali Kheradmand Iran
Massimo Ingrassia Italy
Michael Mulbjerg Pedersen Denmark
Xiaolian Tu China
Sam Wright United Kingdom
Natalie Glover United States
Bert te Wildt relative to Émeline Chauchard France Émeline Chauchard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Émeline Chauchard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bert te Wildt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert te Wildt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert te Wildt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert te Wildt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert te Wildt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert te Wildt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert te Wildt. The network helps show where Bert te Wildt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bert te Wildt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bert te Wildt Line = papers co-authored together Bert te Wildt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200754
2 201652
3 201550
4 200742
5 200738
6 201029
7 202125
8 202023
9 200421
10 202018
11 200515
12 201714
13 201614
14
The COVID-19 Pandemic and Behavioral Addiction - New Challenges for Structural and Behavioral Prevention
20206
15 20135
16 20185
17 20212
18 20052
19 20072
20 20071

About Bert te Wildt

Bert te Wildt is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 420 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (9 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (6 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (2 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (1 paper) and Global Health Care Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (45 citations), Toxicology (23 citations), Clinical Psychology (139 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (69 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (165 citations). Bert te Wildt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin D. Ohlmeier, Marc Ziegenbein, Astrid Müller, Markus Zedler, Jan Dieris-Hirche, Sabine Loeber, Aram Kehyayan, Udo Schneider, Martina de Zwaan and Stefan Kropp. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction Biology, Alcohol and Alcoholism, BMC Public Health, Journal of Behavioral Addictions and Brain and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact