Sam Wright

607 citations
34 papers · 403 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Sam Wright

29 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Sam Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Gender Studies 67
  • Clinical Psychology 133
  • Applied Psychology 24
  • Pharmacy 22
  • Museology 16
Replace Mair Underwood with:
Mair Underwood Australia
Kristina Holmqvist Gattario Sweden
Christopher L. Vowels United States
Alexandra Lonergan Australia
Flora Oswald United States
Denise M. Scott United States
Filippo Petruccelli Italy
Laura Hallward Canada
Deanne Zotter Bonifazi United States
Aimée Coonerty-Femiano Canada
Sam Wright relative to Mair Underwood Australia Mair Underwood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Mair Underwood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Wright. The network helps show where Sam Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sam Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sam Wright Line = papers co-authored together Sam Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200669
2 200453
3 200051
4 200441
5 200134
6 199826
7 197922
8 200119
9 199918
10 201615
11 19999
12 19997
13
New ways to measure personnel turnover in hospitals.
19575
14
Intermediate outcomes of arts projects: a rapid evidence assessment
20135
15 20194
16 20163
17 20003
18
Intermediate Outcomes of Mentoring Interventions: A Rapid Evidence Assessment
20193
19
The joint appointment represents an important way forward for nurses to achieve their ideals.
19852
20 19782

About Sam Wright

Sam Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (3 papers), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (67 citations), Clinical Psychology (133 citations), Applied Psychology (24 citations), Pharmacy (22 citations) and Museology (16 citations). Sam Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Grogan, Hilary Klee, Sarah J. Shepherd, Larry A. Platt, John C. Merrill, Tom Carnwath, Emma Disley, Sarah Galvani, Celia Taylor and Richard Lilford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Psychology, BMC Palliative Care, Journal of Gender Studies, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care and Social Forces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact