Stéphane Deline

19 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Stéphane Deline
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Pharmacology 104
  • Epidemiology 94
  • General Health Professions 69
  • Clinical Psychology 50
Replace Iva Pejnović Franelić with:
Iva Pejnović Franelić Croatia
Federica Mathis Italy
Sara Smucker Barnwell United States
Stanislas Spilka France
Alison Knopf United States
Émeline Chauchard France
Ali M. Yurasek United States
Steven Y. Sussman United States
Zoe Tonks Australia
Birgitte Thylstrup Denmark
Stéphane Deline relative to Iva Pejnović Franelić Croatia Iva Pejnović Franelić's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Iva Pejnović Franelić · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Deline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Deline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Deline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Deline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Deline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Deline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Deline. The network helps show where Stéphane Deline may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Stéphane Deline, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stéphane Deline Line = papers co-authored together Stéphane Deline links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201583
2 201373
3 201460
4 201459
5 201433
6 201424
7 201417
8 201416
9 201415
10 201414
11 201413
12 201412
13 201310
14 20157
15 20146
16 20143
17 20143
18 20143
19 20131

About Stéphane Deline

Stéphane Deline is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Epidemiology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (1 paper) and Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (35 citations), Pharmacology (104 citations), Epidemiology (94 citations), General Health Professions (69 citations) and Clinical Psychology (50 citations). Stéphane Deline has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Studer, Gerhard Gmel, Stéphanie Baggio, Meichun Mohler‐Kuo, Yves Henchoz, Jean‐Bernard Daeppen, Alexandra N’Goran, Katia Iglesias and Marc Dupuis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Journal of Drug Policy, Substance Abuse and Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact