Stéphane Deline

21 papers receiving 578 citations

Peers

Stéphane Deline
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Applied Psychology 44
  • Pharmacology 115
  • Clinical Psychology 89
  • Epidemiology 133
  • General Health Professions 75
Replace Federica Mathis with:
Federica Mathis Italy
Stanislas Spilka France
Sara Smucker Barnwell United States
Ali M. Yurasek United States
Steven Y. Sussman United States
Claire E. Blevins United States
Sergio Fernández‐Artamendi Spain
Amy M. Loree United States
Björn Hibell Sweden
Jillian E. Halladay Canada
Stéphane Deline relative to Federica Mathis Italy Federica Mathis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Federica Mathis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stéphane Deline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stéphane Deline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stéphane Deline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stéphane Deline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stéphane Deline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stéphane Deline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stéphane Deline. The network helps show where Stéphane Deline may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Stéphane Deline, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stéphane Deline Line = papers co-authored together Stéphane Deline links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201590
2 201377
3 201467
4 201464
5 201551
6 201344
7 201436
8 201428
9 201421
10 201420
11 201416
12 201415
13 201415
14 201414
15 201312
16 20157
17 20147
18 20145
19 20144
20 20144

About Stéphane Deline

Stéphane Deline is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Physiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (7 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper) and Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (44 citations), Pharmacology (115 citations), Clinical Psychology (89 citations), Epidemiology (133 citations) and General Health Professions (75 citations). Stéphane Deline has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gerhard E. Gmel, Joseph Studer, Stéphanie Baggio, Meichun Mohler‐Kuo, Yves Henchoz, Jean‐Bernard Daeppen, Alexandra A. N’Goran, Katia Iglesias, Marc Dupuis and Jean‐François Etter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Journal of Drug Policy, Nicotine & Tobacco Research and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact