Benjamin Motz

1.2k citations
36 papers · 655 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin Motz

33 papers receiving 635 citations

Peers

Benjamin Motz
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Computer Science Applications 106
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 197
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 140
  • General Decision Sciences 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 123
Replace Jessika Golle with:
Jessika Golle Germany
Samuel P. León Spain
Elisabeth Norman Norway
Sophie Bridgers United States
David Bridges United Kingdom
Peter Shell United States
Tengfei Wang China
Benjamin J. Dyson Canada
Christof Kuhbandner Germany
Adam Flitton United Kingdom
Benjamin Motz relative to Jessika Golle Germany Jessika Golle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jessika Golle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Motz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Motz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Motz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Motz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Motz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Motz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Motz. The network helps show where Benjamin Motz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Motz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Motz Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Motz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015158
2 2006125
3 200574
4 202134
5 201926
6 200422
7 202121
8 201520
9 202319
10 201818
11 201617
12 201916
13 201313
14 201712
15 202012
16 20229
17 20227
18
Analyzing the Relative Learning Benefits of Completing Required Activities and Optional Readings in Online Courses.
20187
19 20216
20 20206

About Benjamin Motz

Benjamin Motz is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 36 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online Learning and Analytics (12 papers), Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (4 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Educational Assessment and Improvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (106 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (197 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (140 citations), General Decision Sciences (15 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (123 citations). Benjamin Motz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joshua R. de Leeuw, Jeffrey R. Alberts, Ursina Teuscher, Rafael Núñez, Joshua Quick, Robert L. Goldstone, Paulo F. Carvalho, Jeffrey C. Schank, Samuel B. Day and Noah L. Schroeder. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Learning Analytics, PLoS ONE, Behavior Research Methods, Journal of Applied Social Psychology and Journal of comparative psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact