Barbara A. Pine

477 citations
20 papers · 329 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Barbara A. Pine

19 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Barbara A. Pine
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Safety Research 204
  • Public Administration 90
  • Clinical Psychology 40
  • Health 7
  • General Health Professions 14
Replace Tina L. Rzepnicki with:
Tina L. Rzepnicki United States
Hedy Cleaver United Kingdom
Kenneth Burns Ireland
Dendy Platt United Kingdom
Stephanie Cuccaro-Alamin United States
Martin C. Calder United Kingdom
Corinne Wattam United Kingdom
William M. Vesneski United States
Barry Luckock United Kingdom
Eileen Munro United Kingdom
Barbara A. Pine relative to Tina L. Rzepnicki United States Tina L. Rzepnicki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Tina L. Rzepnicki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara A. Pine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara A. Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara A. Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara A. Pine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara A. Pine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara A. Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara A. Pine. The network helps show where Barbara A. Pine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Barbara A. Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Barbara A. Pine Line = papers co-authored together Barbara A. Pine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Effective child welfare practice with immigrant and refugee children and their families.
200661
2
Child welfare education and training: future trends and influences.
200033
3 200830
4 199426
5
Together again : family reunification in foster care
199324
6 199624
7 200921
8 198620
9 199916
10 200216
11 199813
12 199512
13
Reconnecting Families: A Guide to Strengthening Family Reunification Services
199611
14
Strategies for More Ethical Decision Making in Child Welfare Practice.
19877
15 20046
16 20094
17 19963
18 19871
19 20141
20 20090

About Barbara A. Pine

Barbara A. Pine is a scholar working on Safety Research, Public Administration, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Law, having authored 20 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (12 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (1 paper), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper), Public Policy and Administration Research (1 paper), Legal and Social Justice Studies (1 paper) and Migration, Health and Trauma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (204 citations), Public Administration (90 citations), Clinical Psychology (40 citations), Health (7 citations) and General Health Professions (14 citations). Barbara A. Pine has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony N. Maluccio, Elizabeth M. Tracy, Margaret E. Martin and Lynne M. Healy. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Child & Family Social Work, Social Service Review, Journal of Social Work Education and Child welfare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact