Social Service Review

2.1k papers and 31.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Social Service Review in the last decades have received a total of 31.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Service Review usually cover General Health Professions (664 papers), Sociology and Political Science (655 papers) and Public Administration (455 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (400 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (343 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (285 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Service Review are Yeheskel Hasenfeld, Mark E. Courtney, Thomasina Borkman, Evelyn Z. Brodkin, Karen D. Lincoln, Michael Sherraden, Lawrence M. Berger, Mary Ellen Kondrat, Michal Barák and Jan A. Nissly.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Service Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Service Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Service Review.

Countries where authors publish in Social Service Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Service Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Service Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Service Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025