Administration in Social Work

924 papers and 14.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 924 papers published in Administration in Social Work in the last decades have received a total of 14.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Administration in Social Work usually cover Public Administration (278 papers), General Health Professions (237 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (202 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (205 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (126 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Administration in Social Work are Lynn Harold Vogel, Burton Gummer, Madeleine R. Stoner, Hansung Kim, Lawrence L. Martin, Michael J. Austin, Michal Barák, Lee Staples, Anat Freund and Rino J. Patti.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Administration in Social Work

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Administration in Social Work. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Administration in Social Work.

Countries where authors publish in Administration in Social Work

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Administration in Social Work. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Administration in Social Work with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Administration in Social Work more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025