Journal of Public Child Welfare

579 papers and 4.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 579 papers published in Journal of Public Child Welfare in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Public Child Welfare usually cover Clinical Psychology (374 papers), Safety Research (369 papers) and General Health Professions (255 papers) specifically the topics of Child Welfare and Adoption (364 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (309 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (193 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Public Child Welfare are Richard P. Barth, Alan J. Dettlaff, David Royse, Crystal Collins‐Camargo, Mary McCarthy, Traci LaLiberte, Mark E. Courtney, Nancy Rolock, Jennifer Middleton and David Chenot.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Public Child Welfare

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Public Child Welfare. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Public Child Welfare.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Public Child Welfare

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Public Child Welfare. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Public Child Welfare with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Public Child Welfare more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025