Children and Youth Services Review

7.5k papers and 145.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.5k papers published in Children and Youth Services Review in the last decades have received a total of 145.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Children and Youth Services Review usually cover Clinical Psychology (4.2k papers), Safety Research (3.1k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (2.4k papers) specifically the topics of Child Welfare and Adoption (2.5k papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2.4k papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Children and Youth Services Review are James Garbarino, Karie Frasch, Richard P. Barth, Mark E. Courtney, Joseph P. Ryan, Melissa Jonson‐Reid, Murray A. Straus, Julien O. Teitler, Lawrence M. Berger and Barry Checkoway.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Children and Youth Services Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Children and Youth Services Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Children and Youth Services Review.

Countries where authors publish in Children and Youth Services Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Children and Youth Services Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Children and Youth Services Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Children and Youth Services Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025