Anne Barton
Impact in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 7
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 6
- Spanish Literature and Culture Studies 1
- History 6
- Scottish History and National Identity 3
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Richard Cave (1 shared paper)John Kerrigan (1 shared paper)Peter Holland (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Romanticism (1 paper)English Literary Renaissance (1 paper)Essays in Criticism (1 paper)Modern Language Quarterly (1 paper)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anne Barton
18 papers receiving 95 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Literature and Literary Theory 101
- Classics 34
- Museology 26
- History 59
- Anthropology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Barton
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Barton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Barton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Barton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Barton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Barton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Barton. The network helps show where Anne Barton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Anne Barton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 83 | |
| 2 | Essays, Mainly Shakespearean | 1994 | 35 |
| 3 | Shakespeare and the idea of the play | 1962 | 20 |
| 4 | 1990 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1971 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1974 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1984 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1972 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1979 | 3 | |
| 13 | Byron, Don Juan | 1992 | 3 |
| 14 | 1978 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 17 | "Nature's piece 'gainst fancy" : the divided catastrophe in Antony and Cleopatra | 1973 | 2 |
| 18 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 1 |
About Anne Barton
Anne Barton is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Anthropology, Museology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 216 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (7 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (6 papers), Philippine History and Culture (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers) and Spanish Literature and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (101 citations), Classics (34 citations), Museology (26 citations), History (59 citations) and Anthropology (39 citations). Anne Barton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard Cave, John Kerrigan and Peter Holland. Their work appears in journals such as Romanticism, English Literary Renaissance, Essays in Criticism, Modern Language Quarterly and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.