George T. Wright

24 papers receiving 152 citations

Peers

George T. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Literature and Literary Theory 75
  • Classics 21
  • Linguistics and Language 16
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 32
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 41
Replace Samuel Johnson with:
Samuel Johnson United States
D Thomas United States
James Blundell United Kingdom
Ian Bent United States
Maurizio Dardano
Jan LaRue United States
Luca Serianni Egypt
William W. Austin
Edwin A. Abbott United States
Walter Frisch Austria
George T. Wright relative to Samuel Johnson United States Samuel Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Samuel Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George T. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George T. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George T. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George T. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George T. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George T. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George T. Wright. The network helps show where George T. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George T. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George T. Wright Line = papers co-authored together George T. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198862
2 198127
3 199918
4 199516
5 200016
6 197412
7 198910
8
Hearing the measures : Shakespearean and other inflections
20018
9 19868
10 19978
11 19937
12 19616
13 19646
14 19945
15 19604
16 19964
17 19833
18 19922
19
Helicopter Urban Navigation Training using virtual environments
20002
20
Hearing the measures
20011

About George T. Wright

George T. Wright is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Museology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 26 papers that have together received 229 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (3 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Irish and British Studies (2 papers) and Lexicography and Language Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (75 citations), Classics (21 citations), Linguistics and Language (16 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (41 citations). George T. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Anthony Graham‐White, J.A. Webb, Dwaine Rieves, Emily Shacter, N.D. Black, M. McIntyre, Chris Nugent, Ghanshyam Das Gupta, Jane Donawerth and Marina Tarlinskaja. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, ELH and Modern Philology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact