Peter Ure
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
-
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
-
- Irish and British Studies 7
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 3
- Joseph Conrad and Literature 2
- Historical and Literary Analyses 1
- Co-authors
- John Butt (1 shared paper)Kenneth Muir (1 shared paper)Claude Rawson (1 shared paper)John B. Vickery (1 shared paper)H. J. Rose (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (10 papers)Notes and Queries (5 papers)The Review of English Studies (2 papers)English Studies (2 papers)Shakespeare Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Ure
16 papers receiving 41 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Literature and Literary Theory 26
- Classics 8
- Music 5
- History 16
- Philosophy 10
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ure
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ure's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ure with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ure more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ure
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ure. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ure. The network helps show where Peter Ure may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ure, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1969 | 16 | |
| 2 | 1959 | 14 | |
| 3 | Seventeenth-century prose : 1620-1700 | 1956 | 8 |
| 4 | Mr. Hobb[s]'s state of nature considered : in a dialogue between Philautus and Timothy | 1958 | 5 |
| 5 | 1951 | 5 | |
| 6 | Justinian and his age | 1951 | 4 |
| 7 | 1952 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1953 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1966 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1951 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1964 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1951 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1962 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1968 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1958 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1959 | 1 |
About Peter Ure
Peter Ure is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Classics and Archeology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 72 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (7 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers), Joseph Conrad and Literature (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper), Literature Analysis and Criticism (1 paper) and Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations), Classics (8 citations), Music (5 citations), History (16 citations) and Philosophy (10 citations). Peter Ure has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John Butt, Kenneth Muir, Claude Rawson, John B. Vickery and H. J. Rose. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Notes and Queries, The Review of English Studies, English Studies and Shakespeare Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.