Michael Hattaway
Impact in
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
-
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 6
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 4
- Early Modern Spanish Literature 1
- Music 4
- Theater, Performance, and Music History 4
- Co-authors
- Michael D. Bristol (1 shared paper)Ben Jonson (1 shared paper)Norman Rabkin (1 shared paper)Jay L. Halio (1 shared paper)Robert N. M. Watson (1 shared paper)Michael Warren (1 shared paper)Gail Kern Paster (1 shared paper)Colin Burrow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Shakespeare Quarterly (3 papers)The Modern Language Review (3 papers)Journal of the History of Ideas (2 papers)Renaissance Drama (1 paper)Cahiers Élisabéthains A Journal of English Renaissance Studies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Hattaway
14 papers receiving 38 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Literature and Literary Theory 41
- Classics 13
- Museology 7
- Anthropology 18
- History 17
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hattaway
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hattaway's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hattaway with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hattaway more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hattaway
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hattaway. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hattaway. The network helps show where Michael Hattaway may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hattaway, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 23 | |
| 2 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 8 | |
| 4 | 1971 | 8 | |
| 5 | The new inn | 1984 | 7 |
| 6 | 1971 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1968 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 0 |
About Michael Hattaway
Michael Hattaway is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Music, Anthropology, History and Classics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 83 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (6 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (1 paper), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (41 citations), Classics (13 citations), Museology (7 citations), Anthropology (18 citations) and History (17 citations). Michael Hattaway has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael D. Bristol, Ben Jonson, Norman Rabkin, Jay L. Halio, Robert N. M. Watson, Michael Warren, Gail Kern Paster, Colin Burrow, Claire McEachern and Catherine Belsey. Their work appears in journals such as Shakespeare Quarterly, The Modern Language Review, Journal of the History of Ideas, Renaissance Drama and Cahiers Élisabéthains A Journal of English Renaissance Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.