Countries where authors publish in Methods in microbiology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Methods in microbiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Methods in microbiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Methods in microbiology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Methods in microbiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Methods in microbiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Methods in microbiology.
About Methods in microbiology
The 761 papers published in Methods in microbiology in the last decades have received a total of 24.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Methods in microbiology usually cover Endocrinology (59 papers), Ecology (177 papers), Structural Biology (9 papers), Clinical Biochemistry (38 papers) and Molecular Biology (387 papers) specifically the topics of Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (93 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (90 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (86 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (56 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (53 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (49 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (40 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Methods in microbiology are Ken‐ichiro Suzuki, Kazuo Komagata, B Lányi, R. E. Hungate, Karl Heinz Schleifer, Peter Schümann, David E. Herbert, Matthew Collins, R. E. STRANGE and Reinhard Agerer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.