Internet Interventions

About

The 771 papers published in Internet Interventions in the last decades have received a total of 15.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Internet Interventions usually cover Applied Psychology (503 papers), Clinical Psychology (316 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (263 papers) specifically the topics of Digital Mental Health Interventions (479 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (198 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (184 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Internet Interventions are Gerhard Andersson, Per Carlbring, Harald Baumeister, Jiaxi Lin, Hugo Hesser, David Daniel Ebert, Nickolai Titov, Leanne Hides, Blake F. Dear and Daniel Johnson.

In The Last Decade

Internet Interventions

712 papers receiving 15.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Internet Interventions

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Internet Interventions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Internet Interventions.

Countries where authors publish in Internet Interventions

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Internet Interventions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Internet Interventions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Internet Interventions more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026