Anna Chiarlone

1.2k citations
10 papers · 526 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Chiarlone

10 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Anna Chiarlone
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Pharmacology 252
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 229
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 30
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 9
Replace Chalid Ghadban with:
Chalid Ghadban Germany
William Hind United Kingdom
Yunping Song Germany
Na’ama A. Shein Israel
Mylyne Tham Canada
Anne‐Julie Chabot‐Doré Canada
Juliana Maia Teixeira Brazil
Jean-Sébastien Austin Canada
Fuhai Bai China
Sílvia Castany Spain
Anna Chiarlone relative to Chalid Ghadban Germany Chalid Ghadban's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Chalid Ghadban · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Chiarlone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Chiarlone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Chiarlone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Chiarlone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Chiarlone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Chiarlone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Chiarlone. The network helps show where Anna Chiarlone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Chiarlone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Chiarlone Line = papers co-authored together Anna Chiarlone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2014131
2 2015117
3 201174
4 200760
5 200654
6 202029
7 201624
8 201723
9 201611
10 20063

About Anna Chiarlone

Anna Chiarlone is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Complementary and alternative medicine and Surgery, having authored 10 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers), Natural Compound Pharmacology Studies (1 paper), Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation (1 paper), Nigella sativa pharmacological applications (1 paper) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (252 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (229 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (30 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (9 citations). Anna Chiarlone has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Gema Vera, Raquel Abalo, Manuel Guzmán, Ismael Galve‐Roperh, Eva Resel, Cristina Blázquez, Luigi Bellocchio, Beat Lutz, P. A. Cabezos and M. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as eLife, Autonomic Neuroscience, European Journal of Pain, Journal of Neuroscience and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact