Cerebral Cortex

607.5k citations
8.6k papers · · active since 1991

Impact in

    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
    • Neural dynamics and brain function
    • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
    • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Papers in

    • Visual perception and processing mechanisms 1k
    • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 1k
    • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 963
    • Neural dynamics and brain function 730
    • Memory and Neural Mechanisms 543
    • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism 468
    • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms 644

Cerebral Cortex

8.4k papers receiving 591k citations

Peers

Cerebral Cortex
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 340.9k
  • Developmental Neuroscience 26.7k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 59.2k
  • Neurology 26.3k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 52.8k
Replace Nature reviews. Neuroscience with:
Nature reviews. Neuroscience United States
Neuroreport United States
Brain United Kingdom
Experimental Brain Research United States
Trends in Neurosciences United States
Behavioural Brain Research United States
European Journal of Neuroscience United States
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews United States
Nature Neuroscience United States
Current Biology United States
Cerebral Cortex relative to Nature reviews. Neuroscience United States Nature reviews. Neuroscience's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Cerebral Cortex

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cerebral Cortex. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cerebral Cortex with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cerebral Cortex more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Cerebral Cortex

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cerebral Cortex. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cerebral Cortex.

About Cerebral Cortex

The 8.6k papers published in Cerebral Cortex in the last decades have received a total of 607.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Cerebral Cortex usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (5.5k papers), Developmental Neuroscience (652 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k papers), Neurology (313 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (519 papers) specifically the topics of Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1k papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (1k papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (963 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (934 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (730 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (644 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (543 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (468 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cerebral Cortex are Bruce R. Fischl, David C. Van Essen, D.J. Felleman, Antoine Bechara, Döst Öngür, Jeffrey R. Binder, Edmund T. Rolls, Robert J. Zatorre, Alan S. Gevins and David H. Salat.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact