Angelo D’Amore

23 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers

Angelo D’Amore
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Research and Theory 58
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 11
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 119
  • Emergency Medical Services 38
  • Leadership and Management 7
Replace Chang-De Jin with:
Chang-De Jin China
Mi Young Kim South Korea
Tayebeh Mirzaei Iran
Viktória Prémusz Hungary
Eun-Young Kim South Korea
Jan Marie Nick United States
Karen Whalen United States
Pawel J. Krol Poland
Mark H. Greenawald United States
Si Qi Yoong Singapore
Angelo D’Amore relative to Chang-De Jin China Chang-De Jin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.7×
Chang-De Jin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Angelo D’Amore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Angelo D’Amore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angelo D’Amore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angelo D’Amore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Angelo D’Amore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angelo D’Amore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angelo D’Amore. The network helps show where Angelo D’Amore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Angelo D’Amore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Angelo D’Amore Line = papers co-authored together Angelo D’Amore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005109
2 200999
3 201197
4 201077
5 201357
6 201518
7 201416
8 201414
9 201513
10 200913
11 201112
12
Community engagement by two Australian rural clinical schools
201112
13 201611
14 20148
15 20168
16 20147
17 20216
18 20145
19 20215
20 20194

About Angelo D’Amore

Angelo D’Amore is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Research and Theory, General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Workforce Issues (8 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (3 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (58 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (119 citations), Emergency Medical Services (38 citations) and Leadership and Management (7 citations). Angelo D’Amore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Santhamma James, Walter G. Thomas, Eleanor Mitchell, Lisa McKenna, Elisabeth Ruth Jacob, Mary Jane Black, Theda Thomas, Claire L. Curl, Enzo R. Porrello and Stephen B. Harrap. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Nurse, Hypertension, Nurse Education in Practice, Nurse Education Today and Australian Journal of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact