Angelo D’Amore

739 citations
25 papers · 582 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Angelo D’Amore

24 papers receiving 560 citations

Peers

Angelo D’Amore
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Research and Theory 57
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 117
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • Emergency Medical Services 36
  • Leadership and Management 7
Replace Raneem O. Salem with:
Raneem O. Salem United States
Tayebeh Mirzaei Iran
P. Smits Netherlands
Mi Young Kim South Korea
Viktória Prémusz Hungary
John Best United States
Karen Whalen United States
Karen Carlson United States
Helen Lee United States
Sara Mortaz Hejri Iran
Angelo D’Amore relative to Raneem O. Salem United States Raneem O. Salem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Raneem O. Salem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Angelo D’Amore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Angelo D’Amore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angelo D’Amore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angelo D’Amore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Angelo D’Amore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angelo D’Amore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angelo D’Amore. The network helps show where Angelo D’Amore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Angelo D’Amore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Angelo D’Amore Line = papers co-authored together Angelo D’Amore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005101
2 200996
3 201195
4 201076
5 201355
6 201416
7 201516
8 201414
9 201513
10 200913
11
Community engagement by two Australian rural clinical schools
201112
12 201111
13 201610
14 20168
15 20147
16 20147
17 20216
18 20215
19 20145
20 20195

About Angelo D’Amore

Angelo D’Amore is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Research and Theory, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Education, having authored 25 papers that have together received 582 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Workforce Issues (8 papers), Nursing education and management (5 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (3 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (57 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (117 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), Emergency Medical Services (36 citations) and Leadership and Management (7 citations). Angelo D’Amore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include S. James, Walter G. Thomas, Eleanor Mitchell, Élisabeth Jacob, Lisa McKenna, M. Jane Black, Theda Thomas, Claire L. Curl, Stephen Harrap and Lea M.D. Delbridge. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Nurse, Hypertension, Nurse Education in Practice, Nurse Education Today and Australian Journal of Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact