Chang-De Jin

415 citations
22 papers · 286 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Chang-De Jin

20 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Chang-De Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 19
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Leadership and Management 12
  • Education 132
  • Family Practice 8
Replace Óscar Rodríguez‐Nogueira with:
Óscar Rodríguez‐Nogueira Spain
Aylin Durmaz Edeer Türkiye
Kathy A. Baker United States
Suzanne Gough Australia
Pamela McHugh Schuster United States
In Soo Kwon South Korea
Beth Cusatis Phillips United States
Yurdanur Dikmen Türkiye
Claire Su‐Yeon Park South Korea
Seher Ünver Türkiye
Chang-De Jin relative to Óscar Rodríguez‐Nogueira Spain Óscar Rodríguez‐Nogueira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Óscar Rodríguez‐Nogueira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chang-De Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chang-De Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chang-De Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chang-De Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chang-De Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chang-De Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chang-De Jin. The network helps show where Chang-De Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chang-De Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chang-De Jin Line = papers co-authored together Chang-De Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201790
2 201850
3 201831
4 201817
5 201715
6 201714
7 201913
8 201811
9 20199
10 20187
11 20167
12 20166
13 20173
14 20183
15 20203
16 20192
17 20192
18 20201
19 20181
20 20181

About Chang-De Jin

Chang-De Jin is a scholar working on Education, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Physiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (19 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations), Leadership and Management (12 citations), Education (132 citations) and Family Practice (8 citations). Chang-De Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Spain and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Meng Zhang, Chunmei Zhang, Yufeng Li, Yaqian Liu, Lina Meng, Tingting Liu, Tingting Liu, Huiping Wang, Pengxi Liu and Chunmei Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Nursing Sciences, Nurse Education Today, Advanced Functional Materials, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Frontiers of Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact