Eleanor Mitchell

2.2k citations
70 papers · 830 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Eleanor Mitchell

62 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Eleanor Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Library and Information Sciences 48
  • Dermatology 185
  • Periodontics 82
  • Epidemiology 200
  • Immunology and Allergy 35
Replace Hamit Acemoğlu with:
Hamit Acemoğlu Türkiye
Mei‐Ju Ko Taiwan
M P Stern United States
Aécio Flávio Teixeira de Góis Brazil
Zarqa Ali Denmark
Gaby Doumit United States
Eunis Ngor United States
Heayon Lee South Korea
Maurene McQuestion Canada
Lindsay Blake United States
Eleanor Mitchell relative to Hamit Acemoğlu Türkiye Hamit Acemoğlu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.4×
Hamit Acemoğlu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eleanor Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eleanor Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eleanor Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eleanor Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eleanor Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eleanor Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eleanor Mitchell. The network helps show where Eleanor Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eleanor Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eleanor Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Eleanor Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015157
2 2017106
3 201889
4 201751
5 201037
6 201229
7 200624
8 201422
9 202219
10
Past or Portal? Enhancing Undergraduate Learning through Special Collections and Archives
201219
11 201918
12 201714
13 200714
14 202112
15 202212
16 199711
17 20209
18 20229
19 20229
20 20228

About Eleanor Mitchell

Eleanor Mitchell is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 830 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (11 papers), Library Science and Administration (7 papers), Web and Library Services (6 papers), Autoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders (5 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (3 papers), Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (3 papers) and Neonatal and Maternal Infections (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (48 citations), Dermatology (185 citations), Periodontics (82 citations), Epidemiology (200 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (35 citations). Eleanor Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Bradshaw, Kim S Thomas, Lelia Duley, Hywel C Williams, John Norrie, Anthony D. Ormerod, Sarah Barbara Watstein, Jon Dorling, James Mason and Fiona E. Craig. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Reference Services Review, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, BMJ Open and European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact