Andrew E. Reisner
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 14
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 6
-
- Free Will and Agency 5
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
- Co-authors
- Eliot Michaelson (1 shared paper)John Bengson (1 shared paper)Terence D. Cuneo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Journal of Moral Philosophy (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)Ethical Theory and Moral Practice (1 paper)Inquiry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaSwedenUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Andrew E. Reisner
17 papers receiving 233 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Philosophy 278
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
- Cognitive Neuroscience 149
- History and Philosophy of Science 26
- General Decision Sciences 6
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew E. Reisner
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew E. Reisner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew E. Reisner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew E. Reisner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew E. Reisner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew E. Reisner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew E. Reisner. The network helps show where Andrew E. Reisner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Andrew E. Reisner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 24 | |
| 5 | Is the Enkratic Principle a Requirement of Rationality | 2013 | 16 |
| 6 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 11 | Leaps of Knowledge | 2013 | 10 |
| 12 | 2007 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 0 |
About Andrew E. Reisner
Andrew E. Reisner is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Law, History and Philosophy of Science and General Health Professions, having authored 20 papers that have together received 303 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (278 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (105 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (149 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (26 citations) and General Decision Sciences (6 citations). Andrew E. Reisner has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eliot Michaelson, John Bengson and Terence D. Cuneo. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Journal of Moral Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice and Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.