Bart Streumer
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Papers in
- Philosophy 26
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 19
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 14
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 15
- Co-authors
- Brad Hooker (3 shared papers)Daniel Wodak (2 shared papers)David Bakhurst (1 shared paper)Margaret Olivia Little (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2 papers)Analysis (2 papers)Utilitas (2 papers)Noûs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Bart Streumer
28 papers receiving 441 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Philosophy 444
- Cognitive Neuroscience 340
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 137
- History and Philosophy of Science 33
- General Decision Sciences 6
Countries citing papers authored by Bart Streumer
This map shows the geographic impact of Bart Streumer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart Streumer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart Streumer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bart Streumer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart Streumer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart Streumer. The network helps show where Bart Streumer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Bart Streumer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 80 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 66 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 17 | Why There Really Are No Irreducibly Normative Properties | 2013 | 6 |
| 18 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 4 |
About Bart Streumer
Bart Streumer is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers), Free Will and Agency (16 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (444 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (340 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (137 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (33 citations) and General Decision Sciences (6 citations). Bart Streumer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brad Hooker, Daniel Wodak, David Bakhurst and Margaret Olivia Little. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Analysis, Utilitas and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.