Bryan Frances

481 citations
30 papers · 168 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Bryan Frances

24 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers

Bryan Frances
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Philosophy 140
  • History and Philosophy of Science 31
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 57
  • Theoretical Computer Science 1
Replace Andrew Moon with:
Andrew Moon United States
Stewart Goetz United States
Guy Longworth United Kingdom
Katherin A. Rogers United States
Marc A. Moffett United States
Michael Pace United States
Anil Gomes United Kingdom
Thomas Raleigh Germany
Lisa Miracchi United States
Nat Hansen United Kingdom
Bryan Frances relative to Andrew Moon United States Andrew Moon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Andrew Moon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bryan Frances

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bryan Frances's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bryan Frances with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bryan Frances more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bryan Frances

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bryan Frances. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bryan Frances. The network helps show where Bryan Frances may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Bryan Frances, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bryan Frances Line = papers co-authored together Bryan Frances links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201048
2 200514
3 200513
4 202213
5 199811
6 200611
7 20179
8 20159
9 19645
10 19965
11 20194
12 19994
13 20204
14 19983
15 20122
16 20132
17 19992
18 20002
19
Gratuitous Suffering and the Problem of Evil: A Comprehensive Introduction
20131
20 20201

About Bryan Frances

Bryan Frances is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 30 papers that have together received 168 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (19 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (140 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (31 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (57 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (1 citation). Bryan Frances has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Russell Eisenman. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Philosophical Studies, Mind, Mind & Language and American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact