Bryan Frances

489 citations
40 papers · 230 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Bryan Frances

29 papers receiving 178 citations

Peers

Bryan Frances
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Philosophy 192
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 111
  • History and Philosophy of Science 39
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 79
  • General Decision Sciences 4
Replace Lisa Miracchi with:
Lisa Miracchi United States
Douglas Lavin United Kingdom
Markos Valaris Australia
François Schroeter Australia
Karl Schäfer United States
Luca Ferrero United States
Adam Leite United States
Julian Wuerth United States
Andrew Moon United States
Guy Longworth United Kingdom
Bryan Frances relative to Lisa Miracchi United States Lisa Miracchi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lisa Miracchi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bryan Frances

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bryan Frances's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bryan Frances with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bryan Frances more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bryan Frances

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bryan Frances. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bryan Frances. The network helps show where Bryan Frances may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Bryan Frances, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bryan Frances Line = papers co-authored together Bryan Frances links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201059
2 200517
3 200516
4 202213
5 199813
6 201313
7 200611
8 201510
9 201710
10 200910
11 20086
12 20195
13 19995
14 19965
15 19645
16 20204
17 19984
18 20124
19 20134
20 19992

About Bryan Frances

Bryan Frances is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (24 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers) and AI in Service Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (192 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (111 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (39 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (79 citations) and General Decision Sciences (4 citations). Bryan Frances has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Russell Eisenman. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Analysis, Mind, Mind & Language and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact