Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

1.2k papers and 8.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice in the last decades have received a total of 8.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice usually cover Philosophy (651 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (511 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (385 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophical Ethics and Theory (376 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (338 papers) and Free Will and Agency (332 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice are Johannes Himmelreich, Maria W. Merritt, Philip J. Nickel, Kasper Lippert‐Rasmussen, Sven Nyholm, Jilles Smids, Mark Coeckelbergh, Matt Stichter, Thaddeus Metz and Bernd Lahno.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ethical Theory and Moral Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethical Theory and Moral Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025