Amy King

21 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers

Amy King
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Marketing 51
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
  • Development 16
  • Gender Studies 40
  • Political Science and International Relations 84
Replace Kenneth J. Bindas with:
Kenneth J. Bindas United States
Fiona Buckley Ireland
Clive Scott United Kingdom
Christopher Looby United States
Matthew Ming-tak Chew Hong Kong
Troels Bøggild Denmark
Lauren England United Kingdom
Pascal Gielen Belgium
Orian Brook United Kingdom
George H. Roeder United States
Amy King relative to Kenneth J. Bindas United States Kenneth J. Bindas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Kenneth J. Bindas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy King. The network helps show where Amy King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Amy King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy King Line = papers co-authored together Amy King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200981
2 200946
3 201918
4 201611
5 201011
6 202010
7 200710
8 201510
9 20159
10
China–Japan Relations after World War Two: Empire, Industry and War, 1949–1971
20164
11 20243
12 20223
13
Ballot Order Effects Under Compulsory Voting
20063
14
Japan in Australia's 2016 Defence White Paper
20162
15 20152
16 20242
17 20232
18 20241
19 20221
20
Taiwan's Place in Northeast Asia's Memory Contests: Can Strategic Diplomacy Help?
20161

About Amy King

Amy King is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Economics and Econometrics and Education, having authored 27 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Japanese History and Culture (4 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (3 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), International Development and Aid (2 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 papers) and Education Systems and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (51 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations), Development (16 citations), Gender Studies (40 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (84 citations). Amy King has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Leigh, Rosemary Foot, M. V. Ramana, Leonard Jack, Kristen A. Copeland, J’Mag Karbeah, Nicholas Farrelly, Cynthia White, William C. Lineaweaver and Michael Wesley. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science Quarterly, Early Childhood Research Quarterly, European Journal of International Relations, Annals of Plastic Surgery and Security Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact