Countries where authors publish in Social Science Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Science Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Science Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Science Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Social Science Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Science Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Science Quarterly.
About Social Science Quarterly
The 2.8k papers published in Social Science Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 67.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Social Science Quarterly usually cover Gender Studies (441 papers), Communication (275 papers), Political Science and International Relations (867 papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.5k papers) and Health (179 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (652 papers), Social Media and Politics (255 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (205 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (200 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (199 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (127 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (126 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (121 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Science Quarterly are Frederick Solt, Susan L. Cutter, Bryan Boruff, Grace Kao, Mark Warr, Eszter Hargittai, Marta Tienda, Steven Greene, Bruce Bimber and Steven Stack.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.