Countries where authors publish in Social Science Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Science Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Science Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Science Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Social Science Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Science Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Science Quarterly.
About Social Science Quarterly
The 2.8k papers published in Social Science Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 70.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Social Science Quarterly usually cover Political Science and International Relations (897 papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.2k papers), Gender Studies (244 papers), Health (94 papers) and Communication (97 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (635 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (95 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (89 papers), School Choice and Performance (84 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (84 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (84 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (75 papers) and Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (73 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Science Quarterly are Frederick Solt, Susan L. Cutter, Bryan J. Boruff, Grace Kao, Mark Warr, Eszter Hargittai, Marta Tienda, Bruce Bimber, Steven John Stack and Douglas S. Massey.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.