Amardeep Thind

97 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Amardeep Thind
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Health Information Management 279
  • Family Practice 85
  • General Health Professions 822
  • Medical Terminology 8
  • Rehabilitation 174
Replace Gerd Flodgren with:
Gerd Flodgren United Kingdom
Marie‐Pascale Pomey Canada
Dave A. Davis United States
John M. Westfall United States
Stephen Duckett Australia
Donna M. Zulman United States
Dorothy McCaughan United Kingdom
Ronen Rozenblum United States
Laura Sheard United Kingdom
A.J.E. de Veer Netherlands
Amardeep Thind relative to Gerd Flodgren United Kingdom Gerd Flodgren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Gerd Flodgren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amardeep Thind

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amardeep Thind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amardeep Thind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amardeep Thind more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amardeep Thind

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amardeep Thind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amardeep Thind. The network helps show where Amardeep Thind may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amardeep Thind, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amardeep Thind Line = papers co-authored together Amardeep Thind links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013145
2 2014121
3 2012105
4
Implementing electronic health records: Key factors in primary care.
200887
5 201586
6 200879
7 201178
8 200876
9 201071
10 201958
11 201551
12 201248
13 200944
14 200944
15 201242
16 201041
17
Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective.
200940
18 201138
19 201938
20 200538

About Amardeep Thind

Amardeep Thind is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Health Information Management, Epidemiology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (20 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (18 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (17 papers), Medical Coding and Health Information (13 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (13 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (11 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (9 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (279 citations), Family Practice (85 citations), General Health Professions (822 citations), Medical Terminology (8 citations) and Rehabilitation (174 citations). Amardeep Thind has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rose C. Maly, Allison Diamant, Amanda Terry, Moira Stewart, Yihang Liu, Ronald Andersen, John J. Koval, Robert J. Petrella, Bridget Ryan and Gerald Choon‐Huat Koh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dental Education, Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics, Cancer, Health Policy and Journal of Women s Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact