Alison Pullen

5.1k citations
114 papers · 3.5k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Alison Pullen

109 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Alison Pullen
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Gender Studies 1.2k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.0k
  • Public Administration 163
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 133
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 64
Replace Janet Holmes with:
Janet Holmes New Zealand
John C Hagan United States
Amanda Sinclair Australia
Terry Eagleton United Kingdom
Rebecca J. Erickson United States
Ian Parker United Kingdom
Louise Jane Phillips Denmark
Celia Lury United Kingdom
Deborah Cameron United Kingdom
Stefan Hirschauer Germany
Alison Pullen relative to Janet Holmes New Zealand Janet Holmes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Janet Holmes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Pullen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Pullen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Pullen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Pullen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Pullen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Pullen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Pullen. The network helps show where Alison Pullen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison Pullen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison Pullen Line = papers co-authored together Alison Pullen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009158
2 2018147
3 2013146
4 2006146
5 2013143
6 2013138
7 2014127
8 2017112
9 2008108
10 2006103
11 201798
12 201791
13 202075
14 202073
15 202068
16 200468
17 202067
18 201860
19 200957
20 200955

About Alison Pullen

Alison Pullen is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Neurology, Information Systems and Management and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 114 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (35 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (21 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (14 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (11 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (8 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (6 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (6 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.2k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (1.0k citations), Public Administration (163 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (133 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (64 citations). Alison Pullen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Carl Rhodes, Sheena Vachhani, Ruth Simpson, Stephen Andrew Linstead, Thomas Sears, Banu Özkazanç‐Pan, Torkild Thanem, Mary Phillips, Maria Demestre and Patricia M. Lewis. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Work and Organization, Organization, Journal of Business Ethics, Acta Neuropathologica and Human Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact