Ruth Simpson

4.9k citations
98 papers · 3.6k · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Simpson

95 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Ruth Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Gender Studies 1.7k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 967
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 508
  • Public Administration 240
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.6k
Replace Eddy S. Ng with:
Eddy S. Ng Canada
Amy E. Randel United States
Marloes L. Van Engen Netherlands
Sean Thomas Lyons Canada
Mustafa F. Özbilgin United Kingdom
Christine M. Riordan United States
Diana Bilimoria United States
KARYN A. LOSCOCCO United States
Karen Holcombe Ehrhart United States
Michelle A. Dean United States
Ruth Simpson relative to Eddy S. Ng Canada Eddy S. Ng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eddy S. Ng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Simpson. The network helps show where Ruth Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004324
2 1998200
3 2011174
4 2009158
5 2005151
6 2005145
7 2010137
8 2004128
9 2011121
10 2017105
11 200978
12 200674
13 201071
14 201665
15 201462
16 200761
17 200960
18 199753
19 200051
20 199550

About Ruth Simpson

Ruth Simpson is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Management of Technology and Innovation and Public Administration, having authored 98 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (42 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (18 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (17 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (12 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (12 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (11 papers), Management and Marketing Education (9 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.7k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (967 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (508 citations), Public Administration (240 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.6k citations). Ruth Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Patricia M. Lewis, Afam Ituma, Alison Pullen, Adelina M. Broadbridge, Natasha Slutskaya, Jason Hughes, Satwinder Singh, Yochanan H. Altman, Jane Sturges and Yvonne Benschop. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Work and Organization, Gender in Management An International Journal, Work Employment and Society, British Journal of Management and Human Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact