Ruth Simpson

4.9k citations
76 papers · 3.2k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Ruth Simpson

72 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

Ruth Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Gender Studies 1.6k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 888
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 478
  • Public Administration 202
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.4k
Replace Eddy S. Ng with:
Eddy S. Ng Canada
Amy E. Randel United States
Marloes van Engen Netherlands
Seán Lyons Canada
Karyn Loscocco United States
Diana Bilimoria United States
Christine M. Riordan United States
Karen Holcombe Ehrhart United States
Mustafa F. Özbilgin United Kingdom
Michelle A. Dean United States
Ruth Simpson relative to Eddy S. Ng Canada Eddy S. Ng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Eddy S. Ng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Simpson. The network helps show where Ruth Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004311
2 1998186
3 2011160
4 2009147
5 2005141
6 2005139
7 2004121
8 2010119
9 2011108
10 2017101
11 200673
12 200971
13 201064
14 201661
15 200757
16 201456
17 200053
18 200953
19 199750
20 201047

About Ruth Simpson

Ruth Simpson is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Public Administration, having authored 76 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (35 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (14 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (10 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (10 papers), Management and Marketing Education (9 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (9 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (8 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.6k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (888 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (478 citations), Public Administration (202 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (1.4k citations). Ruth Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Lewis, Afam Ituma, Alison Pullen, Adelina Broadbridge, Natasha Slutskaya, Jason Hughes, Satwinder Singh, Yochanan Altman, Jane Sturges and Yvonne Benschop. Their work appears in journals such as Gender Work and Organization, Gender in Management An International Journal, Work Employment and Society, British Journal of Management and Human Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact