Alexander Pepper

615 citations
17 papers · 341 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Alexander Pepper

15 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Alexander Pepper
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Accounting 184
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 100
  • Strategy and Management 126
  • Safety Research 45
  • General Decision Sciences 7
Replace Philipp Meyer‐Doyle with:
Philipp Meyer‐Doyle Singapore
Daniel Han Ming Chng China
Tatiana Sandino United States
Sabatino Silveri United States
Abbie Griffith Oliver United States
Dennis Veltrop Netherlands
Ewald Aschauer Austria
Justin Tumlinson United Kingdom
Jack Brittain United States
Serden Özcan Germany
Alexander Pepper relative to Philipp Meyer‐Doyle Singapore Philipp Meyer‐Doyle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Philipp Meyer‐Doyle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Pepper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Pepper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Pepper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Pepper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Pepper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Pepper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Pepper. The network helps show where Alexander Pepper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Pepper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Pepper Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Pepper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2012199
2 201237
3 201327
4 200221
5 201516
6 202011
7 20207
8 20185
9 20115
10 20154
11 20183
12 20222
13
The Economic Psychology of Incentives: New Design Principles for Executive Pay
20142
14
Written evidence given by Professor Alexander Pepper of the London School of Economics and Political Science to the UK Parliamentary Commission on banking standards
20131
15 20201
16 20240
17 20130

About Alexander Pepper

Alexander Pepper is a scholar working on Safety Research, Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences and Finance, having authored 17 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (6 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (2 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (2 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (1 paper) and State Capitalism and Financial Governance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (184 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (100 citations), Strategy and Management (126 citations), Safety Research (45 citations) and General Decision Sciences (7 citations). Alexander Pepper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Julie Gore, Alf Crossman and Paul Willman. Their work appears in journals such as Economy and Society, Journal of World Business, Journal of Business Ethics, Human Resource Management Journal and Business History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact