Philipp Meyer‐Doyle
Impact in
- Accounting top 5%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- International Business and FDI
Papers in
-
- Corporate Finance and Governance 8
-
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 3
- Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis 2
- International Business and FDI 1
- Political Influence and Corporate Strategies 1
- Co-authors
- Sunkee Lee (3 shared papers)Guoli Chen (2 shared papers)Wei Shi (2 shared papers)Constance E. Helfat (1 shared paper)Olivier Chatain (2 shared papers)Sterling Zhenrui Huang (1 shared paper)Denisa Mindruta (1 shared paper)Evan Rawley (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Strategic Management Journal (5 papers)Organization Science (4 papers)Strategy Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Philipp Meyer‐Doyle
10 papers receiving 430 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Accounting 169
- Strategy and Management 177
- General Decision Sciences 20
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 85
- Management of Technology and Innovation 50
Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle
This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Meyer‐Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Meyer‐Doyle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Meyer‐Doyle. The network helps show where Philipp Meyer‐Doyle may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Meyer‐Doyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 95 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 37 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 34 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 0 |
About Philipp Meyer‐Doyle
Philipp Meyer‐Doyle is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, General Decision Sciences and Finance, having authored 11 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (2 papers), International Business and FDI (1 paper), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (1 paper), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper) and Accounting and Organizational Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (169 citations), Strategy and Management (177 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (85 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (50 citations). Philipp Meyer‐Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Sunkee Lee, Guoli Chen, Wei Shi, Constance E. Helfat, Olivier Chatain, Sterling Zhenrui Huang, Denisa Mindruta, Evan Rawley, Vibha Gaba and Christopher B. Bingham. Their work appears in journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Organization Science and Strategy Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.