Social Justice Research

790 papers and 21.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 790 papers published in Social Justice Research in the last decades have received a total of 21.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Social Justice Research usually cover Sociology and Political Science (533 papers), Social Psychology (248 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (147 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Intergroup Psychology (299 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (145 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (141 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Social Justice Research are Claudia Dalbert, Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt, Tom R. Tyler, Robert J. Bies, David M. Messick, Sheldon Alexander, Marian N. Ruderman, Debra L. Shapiro and Leo Montada.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Social Justice Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Social Justice Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Social Justice Research.

Countries where authors publish in Social Justice Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Social Justice Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Social Justice Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Social Justice Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025