Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

1.2k papers and 33.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics in the last decades have received a total of 33.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (756 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (245 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (184 papers) specifically the topics of Neural dynamics and brain function (424 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (413 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (239 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics are Jonathan W. Peirce, Andrew P. Davison, Gorka Zamora‐López, Hans Ekkehard Pleßer, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Andrew Straw, Romain Brette, Satrajit Ghosh, Dan F. M. Goodman and Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Neuroinformatics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Neuroinformatics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025