Jonathan Haidt
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.02%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Psychology top 0.01%
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Emotions and Moral Behavior
Papers in
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 64
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 31
- Emotions and Moral Behavior 18
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 5
- Co-authors
- Jesse Graham (17 shared papers)Dacher Keltner (8 shared papers)Brian A. Nosek (7 shared papers)Paul Rozin (4 shared papers)Shelly L. Gable (3 shared papers)Craig Joseph (6 shared papers)Ravi Iyer (10 shared papers)Sara B. Algoe (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (7 papers)Cognition & Emotion (6 papers)Psychological Inquiry (5 papers)Emotion (5 papers)Review of General Psychology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Haidt
121 papers receiving 33.1k citations
Jonathan Haidt's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 179
- Cognitive Neuroscience 17.9k
- Social Psychology 16.9k
- Information Systems and Management 4.5k
- Applied Psychology 1.9k
- Sociology and Political Science 15.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Haidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Haidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Haidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Haidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Haidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Haidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Haidt. The network helps show where Jonathan Haidt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Haidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 123 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 4692 |
| 2 | Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 2838 |
| 3 | Mapping the moral domain. Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 1784 |
| 4 | The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1393 |
| 5 | When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1388 |
| 6 | Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 1248 |
| 7 | Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1221 |
| 8 | Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 1183 |
| 9 | How (and where) does moral judgment work? Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 1177 |
| 10 | What (and Why) is Positive Psychology? Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 1038 |
| 11 | Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 1013 |
| 12 | The moral emotions. Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 840 |
| 13 | The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 820 |
| 14 | Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 800 |
| 15 | Witnessing excellence in action: the ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 798 |
| 16 | The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 757 |
| 17 | Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 738 |
| 18 | Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 720 |
| 19 | Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 554 |
| 20 | Hypnotic Disgust Makes Moral Judgments More Severe Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 554 |
About Jonathan Haidt
Jonathan Haidt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 123 papers that have together received 35.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (64 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (39 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (31 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (18 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (12 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers) and Media Influence and Health (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (17.9k citations), Social Psychology (16.9k citations), Information Systems and Management (4.5k citations), Applied Psychology (1.9k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (15.3k citations). Jonathan Haidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jesse Graham, Dacher Keltner, Brian A. Nosek, Paul Rozin, Shelly L. Gable, Craig Joseph, Ravi Iyer, Sara B. Algoe, Joshua D. Greene and Clark McCauley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Cognition & Emotion, Psychological Inquiry, Emotion and Review of General Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.