Jonathan Haidt
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.02%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Psychology top 0.01%
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Emotions and Moral Behavior
Papers in
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 66
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 34
- Emotions and Moral Behavior 24
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction 7
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 6
- Co-authors
- Jesse Graham (20 shared papers)Dacher J. Keltner (8 shared papers)Brian A. Nosek (4 shared papers)Craig Joseph (8 shared papers)Paul N. Rozin (7 shared papers)Ravi Iyer (12 shared papers)Shelly L. Gable (3 shared papers)Spassena P. Koleva (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (7 papers)Cognition & Emotion (6 papers)Review of General Psychology (5 papers)Behavioral and Brain Sciences (5 papers)Emotion (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Haidt
132 papers receiving 39.2k citations
Jonathan Haidt's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
- Cognitive Neuroscience 21.2k
- Social Psychology 20.5k
- Information Systems and Management 5.2k
- Applied Psychology 2.3k
- Sociology and Political Science 18.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Haidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Haidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Haidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Haidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Haidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Haidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Haidt. The network helps show where Jonathan Haidt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Haidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 5286 |
| 2 | Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 3037 |
| 3 | Mapping the moral domain. Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 1895 |
| 4 | The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1587 |
| 5 | When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 1545 |
| 6 | Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 1356 |
| 7 | Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors Hit paper breakdown → | 1994 | 1346 |
| 8 | How (and where) does moral judgment work? Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 1319 |
| 9 | Social Functions of Emotions at Four Levels of Analysis Hit paper breakdown → | 1999 | 1310 |
| 10 | What (and Why) is Positive Psychology? Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 1187 |
| 11 | Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 1166 |
| 12 | Moral Foundations Theory Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 1143 |
| 13 | 1999 | 944 | |
| 14 | The moral emotions. Hit paper breakdown → | 2003 | 907 |
| 15 | Disgust as Embodied Moral Judgment Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 895 |
| 16 | Witnessing excellence in action: the ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 890 |
| 17 | Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 875 |
| 18 | Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog? Hit paper breakdown → | 1993 | 844 |
| 19 | 1999 | 826 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 608 |
About Jonathan Haidt
Jonathan Haidt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 134 papers that have together received 43.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (66 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (39 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (34 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (24 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (12 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (7 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (6 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (21.2k citations), Social Psychology (20.5k citations), Information Systems and Management (5.2k citations), Applied Psychology (2.3k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (18.4k citations). Jonathan Haidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jesse Graham, Dacher J. Keltner, Brian A. Nosek, Craig Joseph, Paul N. Rozin, Ravi Iyer, Shelly L. Gable, Spassena P. Koleva, Peter H. Ditto and Joshua D. Greene. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Cognition & Emotion, Review of General Psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences and Emotion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.